PDA

View Full Version : Middle class: 'On the edge'



TheHipHopBillGates
07-23-2008, 03:54 PM
Experts tell Congress that middle class is struggling with stagnant wages, rising debts and increased expenses.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- America's middle class is growing increasingly squeezed by sagging incomes and soaring expenses, experts told Congress on Wednesday.

Adjusted for inflation, median household income dropped by $1,175 between 2000 and 2007, said Elizabeth Warren, professor at Harvard Law School, in written testimony before the Joint Economic Committee.

At the same time, the average family is spending $4,655 more on basic expenses, such as gas, housing, food and health insurance. Gas alone costs $2,195 more for a family making the same commute in May 2008 as it did eight years earlier.

Families with children saw their child care costs soar. Those with children under age 5 spent an additional $1,508 a month, while after-school costs for older children rose $622.

To cover these soaring expenses, many people have had to turn to credit cards. Nearly 10% of total disposable income in the United States goes to paying off such debt, Warren said.

"There have never been since the Depression so many families standing right on the edge," Warren said. "Families have tightened their belts. They have cut down in every discretionary spending area they possible can."

"These costs are tearing a hole in the family they simply can't make up," she added. "You can't cut out enough lattes to pay for health insurance in America."

Gains go to the wealthy

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who chairs the committee, convened the hearing to examine the impact of rising costs and stagnant wages on the economy.

"There is a silent cry going out as middle class families gather around their dinner tables each night to talk about how to pay their ballooning bills," he said. "Middle class families are the engine of our economy, but their earning power and economic security has actually declined in the last seven years."

Lawmakers focused their questions on comparing the great strides made in productivity with stagnation of wages.

Increasing economic inequality is to blame, testified Jared Bernstein, senior economist with the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute. While the middle class is contributing to productivity, the rewards are increasingly going to the wealthy.

But David Kreutzer, senior policy analyst for the more conservative Heritage Foundation, said it's more accurate to follow the wages of actual workers over time, not to compare the median wage figure. A Treasury Department study released last year, which followed nearly 170,000 taxpayers, found median income of those workers rose 24% between 1996 and 2005.

To help those struggling, Congress should pass a second stimulus package, Bernstein said. But this effort should funnel funds to the states, particularly for infrastructure projects. This could serve as an important source for much-needed jobs.

"Smartly crafted, it has the potential to help generate more economic growth until the imbalances and necessary corrections in key markets play themselves out," Bernstein said. "Infrastructure investment serves a dual role of deepening investments in public capital while creating good jobs for workers that might otherwise be un- or underemployed."

Warren and Bernstein also called for more regulation and oversight of the financial markets, particularly the credit industry, to avoid abuses that lead to bubbles. The last two or three economic downturns were caused by such run-ups.

These bubbles are "a major contributor to the middle class squeeze," Bernstein said.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/23/news/economy/middle_class/index.htm?postversion=2008072313

metfan85
07-23-2008, 10:05 PM
I can't remember where I heard it, but the last time there was such a disparity in earnings between the super rich and middle class was... 1928.

real comforting thought

ShaE
07-24-2008, 11:01 AM
I can't remember where I heard it, but the last time there was such a disparity in earnings between the super rich and middle class was... 1928.

real comforting thought
When only the top rung is eating well and the middle and bottom are falling off, something's horribly wrong with your system. And don't tell me it's b/c everyone but the top is lazy, can't manage money, and doesn't want to work. Not the case.

This does not make for a productive economy. And by addressing this disparity, you get idiots yelling about "redistribution of wealth", nobody's seeking to redistribute wealthy peoples' money, but to ignore the strangulation of everyone BUT the wealthy due to our business practices is just as bad.

The way we're conducting business is only providing for a small fraction of our population while the rest struggle to obtain basic necessities, that's not indicative of a working system.

"These costs are tearing a hole in the family they simply can't make up," she added. "You can't cut out enough lattes to pay for health insurance in America."

Unreal

luvmeluvmycat
07-24-2008, 11:06 AM
When only the top rung is eating well and the middle and bottom are falling off, something's horribly wrong with your system. And don't tell me it's b/c everyone but the top is lazy, can't manage money, and doesn't want to work. Not the case.

This does not make for a productive economy. And by addressing this disparity, you get idiots yelling about "redistribution of wealth", nobody's seeking to redistribute wealthy peoples' money, but to ignore the strangulation of everyone BUT the wealthy due to our business practices is just as bad.

The way we're conducting business is only providing for a small fraction of our population while the rest struggle to obtain basic necessities, that's not indicative of a working system.

"These costs are tearing a hole in the family they simply can't make up," she added. "You can't cut out enough lattes to pay for health insurance in America."

Unreal

Well said..

TheHipHopBillGates
07-24-2008, 11:34 AM
I can't remember where I heard it, but the last time there was such a disparity in earnings between the super rich and middle class was... 1928.

real comforting thought

and what happened after the market crash was regulation, unregulated free market capitalism can't be successful because greed is part of human nature, our current economic problems go back to the Reagans deregulation of industries and of course our dependency on foreign oil.

ShaE
07-24-2008, 11:38 AM
unregulated free market capitalism can't be successful because greed is part of human nature, .
exactly. every system is going to be flawed b/c it's run by people, people are susceptible to greed and corruption, and so inevitably gov't and business are vulnerable to that. letting business go unregulated just means the greedy businessmen will screw you, having gov't control it entirely means the gov't is going to screw you, you have to have a little of both. Some sound, well thought out, and broad based oversight of business by the gov't and the people it serves. Don't put all the power in the hands of few b/c it becomes too easy to grab for yourself.

metfan85
07-24-2008, 12:00 PM
and what happened after the market crash was regulation, unregulated free market capitalism can't be successful because greed is part of human nature, our current economic problems go back to the Reagans deregulation of industries and of course our dependency on foreign oil.

oh yeah absolutely.. i totally believe in regulation TR was one of our greatest President's and he was despised the barons of industry. I just dont believe in over regulation, especially now that were artificially competing with unregulated Third World nations thanks to "free" trade