altered photo

[Nikki]

http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/showcase/la-ednote_blurb.blurb

[twilightbee]

I dont think it looks any better from either one of the original photos. So I dont get what the point was.

But whats your point?

[darius]

her point is that its somehow linked to a conspiracy against israel and a symbol of anti-semitism, and the anti-israeli media is behind it all . . . . or it could be the one time her point is actually something else :flickTong


j/k :D

[twilightbee]

lol

[Nikki]

Originally posted by darius
her point is that its somehow linked to a conspiracy against israel and a symbol of anti-semitism, and the anti-israeli media is behind it all . . . . or it could be the one time her point is actually something else :flickTong


j/k :D

Ha ha ha ha ha ha good one Darius

My point is that this guy broke a journalistic rule for no particular reason. Imagine if photographers always altered photos, what would that say about the integrity of the news being reported.

or....on second thought..........


maybe it is somehow linked to a conspiracy against israel and a symbol of anti-semitism, and the anti-israeli media is behind it all.

Who knows??????????

:flickTong :flickTong :flickTong :flickTong :flickTong :flickTong :flickTong